Main Article Content
This study was conducted to identify brand personality associated with Nike sports shoes among university students based on Aaker’s Framework of Dimension of Brand Personality. A total of 120 questionnaires were gathered from Management students of a Malaysian public university using Stratified Random Sampling method and analyzed using SPSS software. Findings showed that users of Nike sports shoes were highly associated with the personality: Imaginative, Cheerful, Down to Earth, Real, Charming, Trendy, Good-looking and Friendly. In addition, the most dominant dimension of brand personality of Nike sports shoes was the dimension of Dignified. Several implications were drawn based on the findings to enhance Nike’s markets in evaluating their product branding strategy. Consequently, this research contributes to theoretical knowledge and its application in the field of brand personality.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Aaker J. (1997). Dimension of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3): 347-357.
Adamantios D., Gareth S., & Ian G. (2005).The impact of brand extension on brand personality: experimental evidence. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1): 129-149.
Ang L, Dubelaar C. & Kamakura W. (2007). Changing brand personality through celebrity endorsement. ANZMAC:1679-1686.
Batra, R, Donald R.L. & Dipinder S. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences. In Brand Equity and Advertising, David A.Aaker and Alexander L.Biel, Eds.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlsbaum Associates.
Business Hotline (2005).Creating a Brand.. Retrieved on 1 April 2014 from http://www2.accaglobal.com/pdfs/members_pdfs/directors_briefings/ma13bran.pdf
Escalas, E. J. & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3): 378–89.
Fabio, B. & Philip, R.P. (2006). Brand personality differentiation in the Australian action sports clothing market. Marketing Bulletin, 17 (1), 1-16.
Freling T. H. & Forbes L. P. (2005). An empirical analysis of the brand personality effect. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(7): 404-413.
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2007). SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference 14.0 update. Seventh Edition. A Pearson Education Company.
Hair, J.F. Jr. Anderson, R.E. Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Johnson, L. W. Soutar, G. N. & Sweeny, J. C. (2000). Moderators of the brand image/perceived products quality relationship, The Journal of Brand Management, 7(6): 425 – 433.
Kapferer, J. N. (2000). In defense of local brand, Market Leader, 9 (Summer): 39 – 42.
Keller, K. L. (1993) .Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1): 1-22.
Krejcie, R. & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities: educational and physiological measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lee, M. Y. & Oh, K. Y. (2006). An exploratory study in brand personality: a case study of a traditional casual brand in Korea. Journal of Fashion Business, 10(6): 79-90.
Plummer, J. T. (1985). Brand personality: a strategic concept for multinational advertising. Marketing Educators Conference. Young and Rubica: 1 –31, New York.
Plummer, J. T. (2000). How personality makes a difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6):39-168.
Sorayaei, A. & Hasanzadeh, M. (2012). Impact of brand personality on three major relational consequences (trust, ttachment and Commitment to the Brand): A case study of Nestle nutrition company in Tehran, Iran, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(5): 79-87.
Shoki, A., Ooi, T. L. & Ismail, K. (2012), ‘Determination of Brand Personality Dimensions for a Laptop Computer using Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale’, Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 1(1): 114-125.