To enhance the quality of IJIER, We cordially invite some experts to be the Reviewer of...
Peer Review Proccess
IJIER adopts an international review standard which emphasizes research groundwork, novelty, presentation, and format. Papers that authors submit to IJIER must be original work, never published earlier in any medium, and not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. It also focuses on whether the paper based on original research, as well as the creativity of research method and rationality of conclusion. There shall be a review process of manuscripts by one or more independent referees who are conversant in the pertinent subject area.
Authors should strive for maximum clarity of expression, bearing in mind that the purpose of publication is the disclosure of technical knowledge and that an excessively complex or poorly written presentation can only obscure the significance of the work presented. Material which is not essential to the continuity of the text (e.g., proofs, derivations, or calculations) b placed in Appendices The editor evaluates the recommendation and notifies the author of the manuscript status.
The manuscript may be:
*Accepted for publication as it is.
*Accepted for publication with minor changes, with no re-review necessary.
*Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review.
The comments of the anonymous reviewers will be forward to the authors, and when the authors are ready to submit their revised manuscript, read the comments of the editors and reviewers, and respond to them by telling what modifications they have made in their paper or why they have not made the suggested changes. Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in the journals. The review process shall ensure that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers. Acceptance and scheduling of release of documents in these periodicals not implement added criteria and procedures beyond those contained in the review process.
The editorial board is highly committed to the quick review process of the paper, but not with the sacrifice of the right judgment of paper. The review process takes maximum two weeks.
The paper processing chart is as follows.